phoenix_glow posted in her journal about a show that was on TLC last night profiling
the Duggar family -- those people in Arkansas with 16½ kids.
I saw part of that. I was looking for The Daily Show but it wasn't on, so I surfed around a little bit and saw the show about the Duggars. But it bothered me so much that I couldn't watch it, and after about 15 minutes I turned it off and went back upstairs.
I feel so sorry for those kids. As a
letter to the Knoxville News points out:
No one can have 16 children and them receive enough attention from the parents to really feel loved as a child should. It's difficult enough in today's world with just 2 kids. It must be pure selfishness that makes people have so many. My question is what was she having them for? Slave labor? It may be no one else's business but she certainly didn't call for enough privacy in the matter to tell the media not to cover her situation. She's simply asking for criticism.
The regimentation in that household is positively frightening. The kids' first free time of the entire day comes at 4:00 pm -- unless they're the one preparing dinner that day or still need to practice the piano ("seeing we have to take turns with one piano to 11 students!"), in which case they don't get any. They all have to wear
matching colors every day ("Mon- red, Tues- blue, etc") in order to reduce laundry complications.
In addition to 2½ hour naps, the young children are required to
learn self-control & obedience by sitting quietly on a blanket playing with a few toys. The key words are ‘sit’ & ‘quiet’ ... This one tip has changed the atmosphere of our home tremendously. We don’t have little ones tearing up the house as often & getting into things while we are busy.
Occasionally, we still have those moments, but over all the little ones are content. This frees us to be able to accomplish more in our day! We have since, transferred this training to other areas, such as sitting during worship services, shopping trips & when visiting with company…etc. It’s teaching them responsibility (knowing & doing what both God & others are expecting of them) at an early age.
Very convenient for the Mom -- every mother dreams of what it would be like to be able to say "Sit! Quiet!" and be able to enjoy a church service or get through the whole supermarket in peace. But as tempting as it is, that doesn't mean it's okay to train children as if they were rambunctious puppies and order them "Sit! Quiet!" at your convenience. Children
need the freedom to act like rambunctious puppies sometimes -- just as rambunctious puppies do. If you read
their complete daily schedule, these kids seem to spend an unnatural amount of time sitting quietly and attending, even the littlest ones ... right down to the hour of "Bible time with Daddy" that begins at 9:00 pm. "Often our little ones will fall asleep as Daddy begins Bible time, still they love to be with us at this special time. Bedtime is 10:00p.m."
Technically everyone has the same bedtime, from 18 to 0 years old, but of course the older ones actually stay up a little later since they have to put their younger siblings to bed. The parents go to bed too, but they have their own job to do: making more babies.
Instead of having a life, the older children are forced to become parents at an early age:
Our daily routine begins with personal hygiene (get dressed, brush teeth, comb hair, etc…). Each older child has a younger buddy or two that they help. ... [Each] older child & their buddy work together to clean their jurisdictions ... the older children help their buddies with their studies in phonics, math, violin & piano [before they start their own studies].
I can't imagine the soul-destroying limitations these children are growing up with -- both the older ones who are weighed down with way too much responsibility, and the younger ones who will never know what it's like to have a mother who cares for them.
My late husband Tom's older sister was 8 when the next child (Tom) was born, and three more kids followed at 2-3 year intervals after that. Their mother had other interests, so Carmel was given the responsibility of raising her four younger siblings. She changed their diapers, fed them, gave them baths, watched them ... from age 8 until she left home at age 18, she was their primary caregiver.
It destroyed her life. She vowed never to have children because she had already put in her time wiping snotty noses and filthy bottoms, as she put it. Since this was the mid-20th century and the family was very traditional and strictly Catholic, the only way she could see to avoid getting married (which meant having kids, since birth control was forbidden) was to become a nun. So she went into a convent.
But of course she made the wrong choice for the wrong reason, so it didn't take. In the religious turmoil of the 1960s, when so many nuns were leaving convents, Carmel did too. Now close to 40, she wanted desperately to get married and find out what she had missed -- but she was too inexperienced with life and too needy, and she was never successful at dating. She died a very lonely, very bitter old woman.
The younger children in the family were also affected by growing up without a real mother. Their parents were working class immigrants, and their mother's primary activity was to keep the house spotless.
That was too important to allow inexperienced children to do. So when Carmel was in school and little toddler-age Tommy wanted to go out to play in the yard, his mother would put a little harness on him and tie him to a stake out in the yard like a puppy so he would be safe and she wouldn't have to leave her chores to sit outside on the porch. Carmel told him decades later that he didn't know how weird that was, and would eagerly put his little arms up to have the harness put on ... just like a puppy.
It's different if a parent dies. That's devastating for the family, but in a different way: The kids understand why it's necessary for them to take over some of the burden of taking care of the family. It's having a mother who makes herself unavailable to you for one reason or another and delegates the responsibility of raising you to an inexperienced older sibling that I think is damaging.
Sadly, these kids are growing up so isolated from the world -- no school, no television, no friends -- that they're growing up thinking their experience is normal, and will probably replicate it with their own kids because they don't know anything else ... the same way more obvious forms of abuse are propagated from one generation to the next.
And that's why I feel the right to comment on the way someone else is raising their children -- because I think it
is abusive, albeit in a different way than more overt forms of abuse. The mother is addicted to having babies, and doesn't care about what it does to
them. She has talked herself into the idea that this is good for the kids -- for example, she says of making the kids all wear the same color every day, "We call it our ‘homeschool uniforms’. We feel unified & more serious about school, like a team!" If she feels the need to put a good face on a practical reality like dress color requirements, maybe she's trying to keep from admitting the inappropriateness of the whole situation to herself.
Their oldest child, Joshua, is 18, so all of them are still living under their parents' thumb. As time goes on, I'd be delighted to hear that at least one of those kids left home, moved to the city, got a couple of tattoos and became a bartender or an actor or just about anything. They'd probably be disowned, but it would be worth it to them to be free. Sadly, most, if not all, of them will never make it.